[EmData] Grouping fields inside fields on a phonebook

[Cindy Dey]

Hi, 
You can still use Emma's statement with a slight modification. Remove the if statement for the city and the city will print for every record instead of getting lost.

«fields COMPANY, CATEGORY, ADDRESS, TEL, CODE, CITY¶
«if CATEGORY <> prev CATEGORY»«CATEGORY»¶
«endif¶
«CITY» («CODE»)¶
«COMPANY»[tab]«TEL»¶
«ADDRESS»¶

Cindy Dey
Graphic Design Specialist
Bell Industries
580 Yankee Doodle Road, Suite 1200
Eagan, MN 55121
651-203-2323
cdey at bellind.com
-----Original Message-----
From: data-users-bounces at emsoftware.com [mailto:data-users-bounces at emsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Guillermo J. Mendoza
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 12:22 PM
To: Emma Glaisher (Fourninety); data-users at emsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [EmData] Grouping fields inside fields on a phonebook

Thanks for your quick reply Emma,


I just tried your statement after resorting my data, and it seems better, but now, after a change of a category it dismisses the city if the records of the previous category are from only one particular city, and the records of the next category starts with records of that city. (see image http://tinyurl.com/2tzodh)



My goal is to achieve something like this image: http://tinyurl.com/2sts88 (manually made for reference)



Again, thanks in advance for your help...